Over the course of American history,how has the Supreme Court interpreted the interstate commerce clause of Article I,Section 8?
A) The Supreme Court has consistently supported an expansive interpretation of commerce and hence the growth of federal power.
B) The Supreme Court has favored a strict interpretation of interstate commerce,thereby leaving bartering completely unregulated.
C) The Supreme Court has interpreted interstate to mean "between nation-states" and hence not applicable to domestic trade.
D) The Supreme Court was supportive of the federal government early on before limiting the scope of federal power and then consenting to large-scale central regulation of the economy.
E) Early on,the Supreme Court favored a restrictive standard,followed by a broad definition of commerce to crack down on child labor and then a restrictive standard to support the New Deal program.
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q34: Until 2013, states had not been required
Q34: The commerce clause of the Constitution gives
Q36: A prisoner convicted of murder and facing
Q38: In a federal system,the 50 state governments
Q40: The state of Michigan passed a law
Q41: The main issue in the 1824 case
Q42: In McCulloch v.Maryland,the Supreme Court recognized and
Q44: When the Supreme Court ruled that a
Q58: In the case of McCulloch v.Maryland, the
Q62: The obligations imposed on state government by
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents