A judicial interpretation is a device for constitutional change, whereby ________.
A) a court case is accepted for hearing before a state supreme court
B) a court case is accepted for hearing before the U.S.Supreme Court
C) judges write and propose a new state constitutional amendment
D) judges modify a constitution's provision by reinterpreting its meaning
E) judges issue official dissention from the bench concerning a proposed state constitutional amendment
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q1: The trend in new judicial federalism took
Q3: Compared to the federal constitution, state constitutions
Q4: In which of the following states can
Q5: The goal of new judicial federalism is
Q6: Which states' charters, still in effect, are
Q7: What effect does the elaborate detail found
Q8: In which two states is a supermajority
Q10: Which of the following best describes typical
Q11: While practicing new judicial federalism, judges in
Q53: State constitutions are subject only to the
A)standard
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents