Generally, the court system has reversed part or all of discriminatory direct-democracy initiatives that were voted in by the electorate, but this puts the courts in the odd position of actually opposing a majority vote.

Question

Quizplus · Accepted Answer

This statement is true. The court system has, in some cases, overturned initiatives that were voted in by the majority because they were found to be discriminatory or unconstitutional, even though they were supported by the electorate. This puts the courts in the position of opposing a majority vote.

Generally, the Court System Has Reversed Part or All of Discriminatory