In the Case of McDonald V

In the case of McDonald v.Chicago,the U.S.Supreme Court ruled that

A) the Texas Constitution gives citizens a right to keep and bear arms.
B) private citizens have no constitutional right to carry weapons.
C) citizen ownership and use of firearms is a fundamental civil liberty.
D) the right to keep and bear arms is a protected, federal right, but not a protected state right.
E) the ownership of assault weapons is protected under the Constitution.