​Whichof Thesewould Be Considered a Reason in Favor of Texas

​Whichof thesewould be considered a reason in favor of Texas having more publicly funded campaigns?

A) ​State support of candidates would free them of dependence on special interests.
B) ​Citizens would be forced to subsidize candidates whose views many citizens would strongly disagree with.
C) ​Publicly funded campaigns would be limited to general elections; primary elections would still be dependent on special interests.
D) ​If publicly funded campaigns were limited to major parties, it would suppress the expression of alternative views.
E) ​If publicly funded campaigns were open to all parties, it would provide incentive for small fringe groups to claim subsidies to publicize their extremist views.