What Statement Expressesthe Consequences OfEdwards Aquifer Authority V

What statement expressesthe consequences ofEdwards Aquifer Authority v.Buttell Day and Joel McDaniel?

A) ​The Texas Supreme Court sided with the advocates of private property rights.
B) ​The Texas Supreme Court ruled that although the state was entitled to regulate the use of groundwater, its rules in this particular case were unreasonable.
C) ​The court did not leave any clear guidelines as to what kind of regulations are "reasonable," so public agencies do not know what they can and cannot do.
D) ​The court ensured that the future of water regulation in Texas will be confusing, uncertain, and full of lawsuits.
E) ​All of these are consequences of this decision.