In a 2006 Religious Freedom Restoration Act Case,the Court Ruled

In a 2006 Religious Freedom Restoration Act case,the Court ruled that

A) religious use of a tea containing an illegal hallucinogenic drug was protected by the First Amendment.
B) flag burning for religious purposes was constitutional.
C) killing animals for religious purposes was constitutional.
D) prayer in school could never be permitted under the First Amendment.
E) public schools can mandate courses that teach religious doctrine and instruction.