A judicial philosophy that,when making decisions,the courts should see beyond the text of the Constitution or a statute in order to consider broader societal implications is considered to be indicative of judicial:

Question

Quizplus · Accepted Answer

This question is referring to the difference between judicial restraint and judicial activism. Judicial restraint is the philosophy that courts should adhere to the literal language of the Constitution or statute and defer to the decisions of the elected branches of government. Judicial activism, on the other hand, is the philosophy that courts should interpret the Constitution or statute more broadly, taking into account broader societal impacts and injustices. Therefore, the judicial philosophy described in the question is indicative of judicial activism.

A Judicial Philosophy That,when Making Decisions,the Courts Should See Beyond