A philosophy proposing that judges should strike down the actions of the elected branches only if they clearly violate the literal meaning of the Constitution is known as

Question

Quizplus · Accepted Answer

Judicial restraint is a philosophy where judges limit their own power, and only strike down laws or actions of the elected branches if they clearly go against the literal meaning of the Constitution. This approach assumes that elected officials are more accountable to the people and better equipped to make policy decisions, whereas the judiciary should only intervene when there is a clear constitutional violation.

A Philosophy Proposing That Judges Should Strike Down the Actions