In the Moore V

In the Moore v.Kitsmiller case, the Texas Court of Appeals held that:

A) the burden of proof of the affirmative defense of contributory negligence was on the plaintiff to prove beyond a reasonable doubt.
B) it was unreasonable for the jury to infer that Moore was contributorily negligent.
C) the affirmative defense of contributory negligence requires proof both that the plaintiff was negligent and that this negligence proximately caused his injuries.
D) foreseeability does not require that a person of ordinary intelligence should have anticipated the danger created by a negligent act or omission.