In the Zelnick V

In the Zelnick v.Adams case,the Supreme Court of Virginia found:

A) the trial court correctly granted summary judgment, ruling the contingency fee agreement was not binding because Jonathan was a minor when the contract was executed.
B) the case must be remanded for further proceedings, including the taking of evidence on the issue of the factual determination of necessity under all of the circumstances.
C) when faced with a defense of infancy, a court has an initial duty to determine, as a matter of fact, whether the things supplied to the infant under a contract were in the general class of "necessaries."
D) Both (b) and (c) .