In Berg v.Traylor, the court stated that:
A)Craig was not entitled to disaffirm the agreement in question.
B)while no specific language is required to communicate an intent to disaffirm, express notice to the other party is necessary.
C)disaffirmance of an agreement by a minor does not operate to terminate the contractual obligations of the parent who signed the agreement.
D)None of the above.

Question

Quizplus · Accepted Answer

The court in Berg v. Traylor held that a minor's disaffirmance of a contract does not affect the contractual obligations of the parent who also signed the agreement.

In Berg V.Traylor, the Court Stated That