In the case of Michael Silvestri v. Optus Software, Inc., the court held:
A) an objective standard is typically applied to satisfaction clauses in employment contracts.
B) an objective standard must be used in determining what is satisfactory performance in any "satisfaction" contracts.
C) idiosyncratic judgments as to what constitutes satisfactory employee performance are inherently unfair and should not be allowed.
D) in judging a high-level manager's satisfactory performance, a subjective test is appropriate.

Question

Quizplus · Accepted Answer

In the case of Michael Silvestri v. Optus Software, Inc., the court held that in judging a high-level manager's satisfactory performance, a subjective test is appropriate. This acknowledges the complexity and nuanced nature of evaluating the performance of individuals in high-level managerial positions, where objective metrics may not fully capture the scope of their responsibilities or the qualitative aspects of their performance.

In the Case of Michael Silvestri V