Larson & Son manufactured welders that frequently malfunctioned, setting clothing on fire and causing serious burns.Larson & Son sold all of its assets to Swenson Co., which continued to manufacture the Larson welder product line.Eighteen months after Swenson's purchase, one of Larson's customers sued Swenson for injuries caused by a welder purchased from Larson, one year prior to the purchase by Swenson.Under the circumstances, Swenson Co.:
A) cannot be held liable, because it is a corporation.
B) cannot be held liable, because it did not manufacture the welder in question.
C) might be held liable in some states under strict liability.
D) could not be liable if Larson & Son still exists as a corporate entity.
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q27: The consolidation of AB Corporation and ZX
Q41: A _ is a general invitation to
Q42: Which of the following is NOT a
Q43: The court in the Cohen v. Mirage
Q43: Most states grant dissenters' rights:
A)to dissenting shareholders
Q47: A corporation may acquire all of the
Q48: Generally, the secretary of state may commence
Q51: Appraisal rights:
A) belong to dissenting shareholders.
B) can
Q53: Dissolution that is judicial may be brought
Q59: In order to lease substantially all of
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents