In 2010,the U.S.Supreme court further defined the role of forensic analysts,deciding that they are "witnesses" and their reports are "testimonial"-meaning that,under the Constitution's Confrontation Clause,they must personally testify at trial unless the defendant waives his or right to cross-examine them in which of the following cases?

Question

Quizplus · Accepted Answer

The case that further defined the role of forensic analysts as witnesses and their reports as testimonial, requiring their personal testimony at trial unless the defendant waives their right to cross-examine them, is Melendez-Diaz v. Massachusetts.