CASE 4.2
Adam is a 16-year-old who has a history of strange behavior. He is now being homeschooled by his mother because he has a difficult time relating to his peers. His psychologist has diagnosed him with bipolar disorder. One afternoon, Adam goes to the high school that he once attended. He brings his father's revolver and attempts to shoot a few of his former classmates and a teacher. He misses all of his targets and flees the school. He is later apprehended in his home when the principal is able to identify him through the school's video surveillance.
-Adam tells his attorney he should not be responsible for these charges because he was drunk when he went to the school to commit these offenses and that he did not know what he was doing. Under which circumstance would Adam possibly have a legitimate defense of intoxication

Question

Quizplus · Accepted Answer

Adam would have a legitimate defense of intoxication if he unknowingly consumed alcohol that was spiked with rum (which mixed with his medication for his bipolar disorder). In this case, he would not have been aware of the effects of the alcohol and could not have formed the necessary intent to commit the offenses. However, if he voluntarily consumed alcohol, even if it was left unlocked or served to him by his mother, it would not be a legitimate defense for his actions. Similarly, drinking only beer instead of vodka would not be a valid defense.

CASE 4.2 Adam Is a 16-Year-Old Who Has a History of Strange