A fraternity holds a party during rush week at a local college. A number of the guests are not of legal age to drink alcohol so the fraternity does not provide alcohol at the party. Several members of the fraternity go to the bank before the party and withdraw large quantities of one dollar bills to provide change for a vending machine that contains beer in a separate apartment at the back of the fraternity house. The fraternity is charged with recklessly selling alcohol to minors.
-Which of the following cases addresses this issue?

Question

A fraternity holds a party during rush week at a local college. A number of the guests are not of legal age to drink alcohol so the fraternity does not provide alcohol at the party. Several members of the fraternity go to the bank before the party and withdraw large quantities of one dollar bills to provide change for a vending machine that contains beer in a separate apartment at the back of the fraternity house. The fraternity is charged with recklessly selling alcohol to minors.
-Which of the following cases addresses this issue?​

Quizplus · Accepted Answer

This case addresses the issue of recklessly selling alcohol to minors, which is the charge that the fraternity in the given scenario is facing. Therefore, A) State v. Zeta Chi Fraternity is the best choice. The other options are not relevant as there is no indication of those fraternities being charged with similar offenses.

A Fraternity Holds a Party During Rush Week at a Local