Beth Roberts purchased a "new" car from Honest John's Car Lot six months ago. The sales agreement expressly described the vehicle as a new car, and all usual factory papers accompanied the sale. However, Beth discovered that the car actually was acquired by Honest John's from another dealer who had used it as a demonstrator and loaned it to business friends on a regular basis. The car had more than 10,000 miles on it, a fact that had been concealed by turning back the odometer. Beth also discovered that Honest John's apparently had engaged in this practice before. Beth is suing for breach of contract. She is asking for compensatory damages equal to the difference between the new car price she paid and the average price the vehicle would have brought as a used car. In addition, she is asking for damages in the amount of $5,000. Honest John's attorney has told Beth that she will fight both claims and has advised Beth that the court will not award $5,000 as punitive damages for such a suit. What do you think?
Correct Answer:
Verified
View Answer
Unlock this answer now
Get Access to more Verified Answers free of charge
Q39: In a breach of contract situation, the
Q40: _ occurs when a party expressly declares
Q41: The party that breaks a contract may
Q42: The damages that are typically recoverable when
Q43: Which is not a correct statement concerning
Q45: Which is not a correct statement concerning
Q46: The rule of mitigation of damages requires
Q47: Between experienced businesspersons, exculpatory clauses are generally:
A)
Q48: A provision stipulating the amount of money
Q49: If an exculpatory clause limits liability for
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents