Which of the following statements is/are true about ambiguities in the visual significance of single-case design outcomes?
A) They can be reduced by unobtrusive measurement.
B) They can be reduced by replication.
C) They are caused by transforming auto-correlated data.
D) Nothing can be done to reduce the ambiguities.

Question

Which of the following statements is/are true about ambiguities in the visual significance of single-case design outcomes?​
A) ​They can be reduced by unobtrusive measurement.
B) They can be reduced by replication.​
C) They are caused by transforming auto-correlated data.​
D) Nothing can be done to reduce the ambiguities.​

Quizplus · Accepted Answer

Ambiguities in the visual significance of single-case design outcomes can be reduced by replication. Replication involves gathering data from multiple cases or conducting the same study multiple times, which can help to increase the generalizability of the findings and reduce the potential impact of outliers or individual differences. Obtrusive measurement, on the other hand, can actually increase ambiguities by altering the behavior of the participants being studied. Auto-correlation refers to the tendency of data points to be correlated with one another over time, and while it can be a source of ambiguity in some cases, it is not necessarily the only cause of ambiguity in single-case design outcomes. Finally, while it may be true that there are limits to how much we can reduce ambiguities in single-case design outcomes, it is not accurate to say that nothing can be done to address these challenges.

Which of the Following Statements Is/are True About Ambiguities in the Visual