In what legal case did the Supreme Court of Canada rule that police interrogation techniques using psychological coercion were an accep way to extract confessions and were admissible in court?
A)R.v.Swain
B)R.v.L.T.H.
C)R.v.Gladue
D)R.v.Oickle
E)R.v.Hubbert

Question

Quizplus · Accepted Answer

R.v.Oickle is the case where the Supreme Court of Canada ruled that certain police interrogation techniques, even if they involve psychological coercion, can be acceptable and that confessions obtained through these means can be admissible in court, provided they are voluntary and not obtained through oppressive conditions.

In What Legal Case Did the Supreme Court of Canada