According to R.v.Mohan (1994),which is not a consideration when determining the admissibility of expert testimony?
A)The expert must be qualified.
B)The testimony must provide information that goes beyond the jurors' common understanding.
C)The evidence provided must be necessary for assisting the trier of fact.
D)The testimony must have been allowed into evidence by a higher court.
E)The evidence must not violate any rules of exclusion.

Question

Quizplus · Accepted Answer

The fact that the testimony has been allowed into evidence by a higher court is not a consideration when determining the admissibility of expert testimony. The other options are important factors that are considered when determining the admissibility of expert testimony.