Isidro issued a negotiable promissory note to his attorney in return for the attorney's promise to perform legal services. The attorney never rendered the legal services but quickly negotiated the note to Anna, a holder in due course. Anna and Mark were involved in business negotiations and Anna offered to purchase a car from Mark. She offered as part payment for the car the note issued by Isidro. By coincidence, Mark knew both Isidro and the attorney and the facts concerning the note and the unperformed legal services. Despite this, Mark accepted a negotiation of the note from Anna. Isidro refused to pay the note and Mark eventually sued Isidro to collect. What is the probable outcome?
Correct Answer:
Verified
View Answer
Unlock this answer now
Get Access to more Verified Answers free of charge
Q40: In 1976 the FTC adopted a rule
Q41: A holder through a holder in due
Q42: Fraud in factum:
A) occurs when a person
Q43: Fraud in the inducement is a:
A) limited
Q44: A taker of a negotiable instrument may
Q46: Which of the following is not a
Q47: The FTC rule, which provides that a
Q48: Manuel sued Patricia on a promissory note.
Q49: A negotiable promissory note was issued by
Q50: Universal defenses work against all of the
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents