Miriam issued two checks. The first check was made payable to her neighbor for a used car that the neighbor sold to Miriam. The second check was a rent payment to Miriam's landlord for the current month's rent.?The car was purchased on the basis of the neighbor's written assurance that the car had only 38,000 miles of use. After Miriam took possession of the car, Miriam's mechanic checked the vehicle and substantiated that the odometer had been turned back. The car had actually been used for 79,000 miles. Miriam stopped payment on the check and offered to return the car. Meanwhile, the neighbor had purchased a computer and had negotiated Miriam's check to the vendor in payment. Discouraged by the problems with the car, Miriam decided to take a vacation. She issued a written stop payment to her bank on the rent check because she intended to use this money for the vacation. Although the drawee bank had ample time to act, it made an error and paid the rent check instead of stopping payment. Two lawsuits resulted. In the first, the vendor of the computer sued Miriam on the check. In the second, Miriam sued her bank for paying over her timely stop payment order. Decide both cases.
Correct Answer:
Verified
View Answer
Unlock this answer now
Get Access to more Verified Answers free of charge
Q43: The EFTA is concerned with the:
A) elimination
Q44: Funds transfers made by businesses are governed
Q45: A consumer who notifies the issuer of
Q46: A thief stole Art's checkbook and forged
Q47: If a consumer reports the loss before
Q49: Consumers have the responsibility to examine periodic
Q50: The Railway Express Agency delivered a shipment
Q51: If a bank pays a check whose
Q52: When a drawee bank pays on a
Q53: Customers are precluded from asserting unauthorized signatures
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents