In Federal Election Commission V

 In Federal Election Commission v.Wisconsin Right to Life,the Supreme Court held that 

A)  McCain-Feingold, a campaign finance law, was constitutional. 
B)  issue advocacy was not protected by the First Amendment and could be banned. 
C)  issue advocacy was protected by the First Amendment and could not be banned. 
D)  speech required money, and so campaign finance laws were illegal. 
E)  None of these are correct.