Those advocating a need allocation standard argue that
A) those who contributed more should receive more, in proportion to the magnitude of their contribution.
B) everyone should receive the same outcome.
C) parties should receive more in proportion to some demonstrated need for the resource.
D) decision rules in coalitions should be made on an individual, case-by-case basis.
E) Those advocating a need standard argue for all of the above.
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q28: Why are potential coalitions of interests to
Q31: The "joining threshold" is
A) the total number
Q32: Coalitions build by
A) organizing members through formal
Q32: What kind networks to founders usually have,
Q43: Adversaries can be described as
A) parties who
Q47: Why might founders have to offer an
Q54: What are the properties of a coalition?
Q55: Bedfellows are parties with whom a negotiator
Q58: Strategic power in coalitions
A) emerges from the
Q59: What is the strength in weakness argument?
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents