Some courts have rejected the requirement of privity for malpractice and instead approach each situation on a case-by-case basis.

Question

Quizplus · Accepted Answer

Some courts have indeed rejected the requirement of privity for malpractice and instead determine each situation on a case-by-case basis. This means that a person who was not in a direct contractual relationship with a professional may still sue them for malpractice if they were directly affected by the professional's actions.

Some Courts Have Rejected the Requirement of Privity for Malpractice