Rule-utilitarianism has been accused of being internally inconsistent because the theory can:
A)easily collapse into act-utilitarianism.
B)be defended through act-utilitarianism.
C)always fall back on rigid rules.
D)never be understood.

Question

Quizplus · Accepted Answer

Rule-utilitarianism is supposed to be a theory in which the morality of a decision is determined by the utility of following a certain rule. However, if the rule that is being followed is always the one that leads to the greatest overall utility, this collapses into act-utilitarianism. Thus, rule-utilitarianism can be accused of being internally inconsistent as it is difficult to distinguish it from act-utilitarianism in certain cases.

Rule-Utilitarianism Has Been Accused of Being Internally Inconsistent Because the Theory