Alberto attended a demonstration by Mexican-Americans in Douglas, Arizona, which was held to demonstrate against laws allowing law enforcement officers to stop any vehicle occupied by Mexican-Americans without probable cause for the purpose of verification of U.S. citizenship. During the demonstration, Alberto lowered an American flag that was flying in front of a private business. Alberto removed the flag and tossed it onto the ground. He then soaked the flag in lighter fluid and set fire to the flag. Alberto taunted anyone standing around or passing by in a motor vehicle to stop him from committing the act. What crime or crimes did Alberto commit? What charges may be filed against Alberto, if any? Would any American be within his or her rights to physically assault Alberto in attempt to stop him from removing the flag from the flagpole or from setting fire to the flag? If not, what charges could be filed against anyone who chose to comply with Alberto's taunt and engage him in a physical altercation? In your opinion, should a person be allowed to burn or desecrate the American flag or any state flag? If so, why? If not, why?
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q45: The First Amendment literally forbids the abridgement
Q46: The _is often expressed through the Latin
Q47: Sally Smith is a well-known thief that
Q48: _ is an interpretation of the U.S.
Q49: Common law offers one distinct advantage in
Q51: In many states verbal provocation is insufficient
Q52: Discuss the ex post facto law prohibition
Q53: Taken to the extreme, the _ can
Q54: The advantage of the legality principle is
Q55: _ is a law that criminalizes conduct
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents