In Foreman v. United States, the District of Columbia Court of Appeals reversed and remanded the case based on the fact that the prosecution failed to provide proof to the jury that the act included a value of $250 or more.

Question

Quizplus · Accepted Answer

This statement is true. In Foreman v. United States, the court found that the prosecution had not provided sufficient evidence to prove the value of the stolen property was over $250, which was a necessary element of the crime charged. As a result, the court reversed and remanded the case for a new trial.

In Foreman V