Which of the following statements is true of quid pro quo harassment?
A) A supervisor can be held guilty of quid pro quo harassment if he or she tells jokes that are suggestive or sexual in nature.
B) For proving charges of quid pro quo harassment, a plaintiff only needs to prove that the working condition at a workplace is hostile.
C) A supervisor can be held guilty of quid pro quo harassment if he or she promotes an employee in return of sexual favors.
D) A company cannot be heald liable for an employee's actions in cases of quid pro quo harassment.

Question

Quizplus · Accepted Answer

Quid pro quo harassment occurs when a supervisor or someone in a position of authority makes employment decisions based on the submission to or rejection of sexual advances. This can include promises of promotions, salary increases, or other benefits. Therefore, option C is the correct statement. Option A is incorrect as telling jokes may contribute to a hostile work environment, but it does not necessarily constitute quid pro quo harassment. Option B is incorrect as hostile work environment harassment is a different type of harassment altogether. Option D is incorrect as companies may be held liable for employee actions in cases of quid pro quo harassment if they failed to take reasonable action to prevent or address such behavior.

Which of the Following Statements Is True of Quid Pro