The 2003 Hutterian Brethren of Wilson County v.Province of Alberta case involved new regulations that required a photo be provided for all drivers' licences to combat the growing problem of identity theft.How did the court rule?
A) in favour of the Hutterian Brethren because their belief in the second commandment prohibiting the taking of images was sincerely held
B) in favour of the province because the Hutterian Brethren could not substantiate their belief with biblical evidence
C) in favour of the Hutterian Brethren because the province had previously allowed religious groups opposed to having their picture taken to obtain photo-less licences.
D) in favour of the province because the necessity of a universal photo bank to combat fraud outweighed the religious rights of the Hutterian Brethren
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q14: Michael is filling in his census form.He
Q15: In the 2009 case of Saadi v.Audmax
Q16: Amir has asked his employer if he
Q17: Between 1991 and 2001, which religious group
Q18: Chapter 10's "In Their Shoes" feature recounts
Q20: Who is responsible for investigating, protecting, and
Q21: In Friya's neighbourhood all the residences have
Q22: In response to a poll by CBC
Q23: What are the changing religious demographics in
Q24: Which term refers to the belief that
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents