Which of the following is NOT a reason to scientifically evaluate the plausibility of claims made by a psychic who states that a missing child is alive and located in a particular area of the countryside months after the child went missing?

Question

Quizplus · Accepted Answer

Anecdotal evidence is not sufficient to establish the plausibility of a claim. It needs to be scientifically evaluated through empirical evidence and rigorous testing. Therefore, D is the incorrect option as it does not provide a valid reason to scientifically evaluate the claim. A, B, and C provide valid reasons as they reflect the potential consequences of not evaluating the claim.

Which of the Following Is NOT a Reason to Scientifically