Continuous reinforcement is less subject to extinction than intermittent reinforcement.

Question

Quizplus · Accepted Answer

Intermittent reinforcement has been found to be less subject to extinction than continuous reinforcement. This is because intermittent reinforcement involves reinforcing the behavior only some of the time, which makes it more unpredictable and therefore more resistant to extinction. In contrast, continuous reinforcement involves reinforcing the behavior every time it occurs, which can lead to a more rapid extinction once the reinforcement is no longer provided.

Continuous Reinforcement Is Less Subject to Extinction Than Intermittent Reinforcement