Many people think that nuclear proliferation can be best understood as a tragedy of the commons.If someone sees nuclear proliferation this way,which of the following might he or she propose as a solution?

Question

Quizplus · Accepted Answer

Viewing nuclear proliferation as a tragedy of the commons implies that this is a collective problem that requires collective action. A grassroots movement demanding that governments destroy nuclear warheads would be a solution based on collective action, as it would require cooperation among nations. Option B does not address the root cause of the problem, but rather seeks to protect against the consequences of nuclear war. Option C may contribute to reducing the risk of nuclear proliferation, but it may not be enough on its own. Option D again only deals with the consequences of nuclear war, rather than preventing it in the first place.

Many People Think That Nuclear Proliferation Can Be Best Understood