Raul was researching an issue and found two Tax Court decisions issued within 6 months of each other,one for a taxpayer residing in California and the other for a taxpayer residing in New York whose rulings were inconsistent.Raul knows that the federal tax law does not differ by state and the issue was exactly the same in both cases.Raul is confused because he thought that a basic judicial doctrine was that a court is supposed to rule consistently.Name and describe this judicial doctrine that requires judicial consistency and discuss why the Tax Court may have intentionally ruled inconsistently in this example.

Question

Quizplus · Accepted Answer

The Answer of Raul was researching an issue and found two Tax Court decisions issued within 6 months of each other,one for a taxpayer residing in California and the other for a taxpayer residing in New York whose rulings were inconsistent.Raul knows that the federal tax law does not differ by state and the issue was exactly the same in both cases.Raul is confused because he thought that a basic judicial doctrine was that a court is supposed to rule consistently.Name and describe this judicial doctrine that requires judicial consistency and discuss why the Tax Court may have intentionally ruled inconsistently in this example.

Raul Was Researching an Issue and Found Two Tax Court