Suppose a utilitarian judge decides to rule against a plaintive in a law suit just because people in general would be happier if the plaintive lost the case.Such a utilitarian move would conflict with:

Question

Quizplus · Accepted Answer

Utilitarianism places emphasis on maximizing overall happiness, but it does not necessarily prioritize individual rights or justice. This conflict between utilitarianism and justice is highlighted in this scenario, as the judge is not considering the fairness or justice of the case, but rather the potential happiness of society as a whole. This goes against the commonsense view that justice should be upheld, even if it may not lead to the greatest overall happiness.

Suppose a Utilitarian Judge Decides to Rule Against a Plaintive