The implication of the "Big Fish,Little Pond" idea is that
A)children in "average" schools may feel better about their own abilities than those in "high-ability" schools.
B)larger schools are likely to promote higher achievement than smaller schools.
C)self-concept is lower when competition is weaker than when it is stronger.
D)smaller schools offer limited opportunities for self-concept to develop.

Question

Quizplus · Accepted Answer

The "Big Fish, Little Pond" idea suggests that children in average schools may feel better about their abilities in comparison to those in high-ability schools, as they are the "big fish" in a small pond, whereas in high-ability schools, they would be a smaller fish in a bigger pond. This idea is related to the concept of social comparison theory and the impact of the environment on self-concept. Option B is incorrect because the size of the school does not necessarily determine academic achievement. Option C is incorrect because weaker competition does not necessarily lower self-concept. Option D is incorrect because opportunities for self-concept can develop in any school, regardless of size.

The Implication of the "Big Fish,Little Pond" Idea Is That