A cost-benefit analysis of the acid rain prevention programs shows that
A)there was no net economic benefit.
B)there was a large benefit and savings compared to costs.
C)there was a large loss because costs far outweighed benefits
D)with vastly increased spending,the program could show a net benefit.

Question

Quizplus · Accepted Answer

The presence of the word "large" implies that there was a significant economic benefit from the acid rain prevention programs compared to the costs. Therefore, option B is the best choice. Option A suggests there was no benefit, which is unlikely given the emphasis on environmental protection in many countries. Option C shows a large loss, which is also unlikely. Option D suggests that more funding is needed to achieve a net benefit, but there is no evidence that increased spending would result in a positive outcome.

A Cost-Benefit Analysis of the Acid Rain Prevention Programs Shows