How do social scientists generally view the peer-review process?
A) Its benefits are not worth the time it takes.
B) The growth of predatory journals has diminished the value of the peer-review process for all journals.
C) It is very strong and only very occasionally has flaws.
D) It is a human process,and thus flawed,but on the whole,it is the best method for ensuring quality research.
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q42: Social scientists prefer the active voice over
Q43: Briefly describe a study for which a
Q44: What are three meaningful differences between an
Q45: The failure to properly cite another author's
Q46: What is the difference between a policy
Q48: How is an editorial different than a
Q49: In the case of _,the peer-review process
Q50: You have written a research report.You could
Q51: What is the textbook authors' view of
Q52: You have completed a quantitative research study
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents