Terrorist groups being unable to rein in "loose cannons" represents what kind of threat to bargaining?

Question

Quizplus · Accepted Answer

The inability to control "loose cannons" within a terrorist group represents a commitment problem, where the group may not be able to guarantee that its members will follow through on any agreements made during bargaining. This can make negotiations more difficult and potentially undermine the effectiveness of any agreements reached. Information asymmetries refer to situations where one party has more information than the other, international intervention involves outside parties becoming involved in the negotiation process, and brinkmanship bargaining involves intentionally pushing a situation to the brink in order to gain a better bargaining position. None of these directly relate to the issue of loose cannons within terrorist groups.

Terrorist Groups Being Unable to Rein in "Loose Cannons" Represents