In Gonzalez v.Raich,patients who were prescribed medical marijuana sought to prevent enforcement of the federal Controlled Substances Act (CSA)in medical marijuana cases.They claimed enforcement violated the Commerce Clause because the medical marijuana was cultivated and possessed within state borders and did not enter the stream of commerce.The U.S.Supreme Court decided

Question

Quizplus · Accepted Answer

A) The court held that the government provided a rational basis in claiming that an exemption to enforcement would undermine the orderly enforcement of the entire regulatory scheme, and held that the CSA was a valid exercise of congressional powers derived from the Commerce Clause.
P) The court held that the government provided a rational basis in claiming that an exemption to enforcement would undermine the orderly enforcement of the entire regulatory scheme, and held that the CSA was a valid exercise of congressional powers derived from the Commerce Clause.
Q) The court held that the government provided a rational basis in claiming that an exemption to enforcement would undermine the orderly enforcement of the entire regulatory scheme, and held that the CSA was a valid exercise of congressional powers derived from the Commerce Clause.
R) The court held that the government provided a rational basis in claiming that an exemption to enforcement would undermine the orderly enforcement of the entire regulatory scheme, and held that the CSA was a valid exercise of congressional powers derived from the Commerce Clause.

In Gonzalez V