Minimum contacts in a state need not be shown if an out-of-state corporation's conduct has the reasonably foreseeable potential to cause injurious effects to a forum state plaintiff.

Question

Quizplus · Accepted Answer

This statement is true. It is based on the legal concept of "purposeful availment," which means that a corporation must have purposefully directed its activities toward the forum state in order to establish minimum contacts. However, if an out-of-state corporation's conduct has the reasonably foreseeable potential to cause harm to a forum state plaintiff, the corporation may be subject to personal jurisdiction in that state even without showing minimum contacts. This is known as the "stream of commerce" theory of personal jurisdiction.

Minimum Contacts in a State Need Not Be Shown If