In Keeton V

In Keeton v.Hustler Magazine,the New Hampshire court determined that

A) mere regular circulation of a magazine is insufficient alone to create jurisdiction if no physical presence of the defendant can be shown in the state.
B) regular circulation of a magazine is sufficient to establish jurisdiction in a defamation case because of the potential for injurious effects of defamatory articles even without an otherwise physical presence of the defendant.
C) Hustler, due to its pornographic nature, loses constitutional protections and is subject to personal jurisdiction based on fundamental fairness for the plaintiff.
D) regular circulation of a magazine is considered a physical presence in a forum state due to the tangible nature of the magazine itself.