In Bridgestone Americas Holding,Inc.,v.Mayberry,the court had to determine if Bridgestone's trade secret for a particular formula was discoverable.The court decided that

Question

Quizplus · Accepted Answer

A) Courts apply a three-part balancing test and will not force disclosure of a trade secret unless it is absolutely pertinent to a plaintiff's case. In Bridgestone, the trade secret formula was not discoverable because the case could be proved by the tire's appearance.
\) Courts apply a three-part balancing test and will not force disclosure of a trade secret unless it is absolutely pertinent to a plaintiff's case. In Bridgestone, the trade secret formula was not discoverable because the case could be proved by the tire's appearance.
]) Courts apply a three-part balancing test and will not force disclosure of a trade secret unless it is absolutely pertinent to a plaintiff's case. In Bridgestone, the trade secret formula was not discoverable because the case could be proved by the tire's appearance.
^) Courts apply a three-part balancing test and will not force disclosure of a trade secret unless it is absolutely pertinent to a plaintiff's case. In Bridgestone, the trade secret formula was not discoverable because the case could be proved by the tire's appearance.