In Florence Cement Company v.Vittraino,Florence sought to pierce Shelby's corporate veil and hold the principals personally liable by claiming Shelby mixed personal and business transactions and had engaged in fraud in a loan application.The appeals court held that

Question

Quizplus · Accepted Answer

A) The court held that the veil could be pierced because the principals did not treat
Shelby as a separate entity.
P) The court held that the veil could be pierced because the principals did not treat Shelby as a separate entity.
Q) The court held that the veil could be pierced because the principals did not treat Shelby as a separate entity.
R) The court held that the veil could be pierced because the principals did not treat Shelby as a separate entity.

In Florence Cement Company V