If there is no direct evidence of an agreement to manipulate the competitive market between two CEOs,a prosecutor may use their calendars and subsequent actions that were not in the usual course of business as circumstantial evidence to prove the _______ requirement of an antitrust violation.

Question

Quizplus · Accepted Answer

A) Prosecutors may use circumstantial evidence to prove the necessary element of a
meeting of the minds.
A) Prosecutors may use circumstantial evidence to prove the necessary element of a meeting of the minds.
B) Prosecutors may use circumstantial evidence to prove the necessary element of a meeting of the minds.
C) Prosecutors may use circumstantial evidence to prove the necessary element of a meeting of the minds.

If There Is No Direct Evidence of an Agreement to Manipulate