In Birdsong v.Apple,Inc.,Birdsong brought a class action suit against Apple,alleging that iPod owners had suffered hearing loss using the iPod earbuds set at the highest decibel level.Birdsong claimed Apple breached an implied warranty of merchantability.The court held

Question

Quizplus · Accepted Answer

A) The court upheld the decision in favor of Apple, rejecting the argument that the iPod was not merchantable because its earbuds are designed to be placed deep into the ear canal rather than over the ears, which increases the danger of hearing damage. The court pointed out that the ordinary use of the iPod was to listen to music and that the product was fit for that use.
D) The court upheld the decision in favor of Apple, rejecting the argument that the iPod was not merchantable because its earbuds are designed to be placed deep into the ear canal rather than over the ears, which increases the danger of hearing damage. The court pointed out that the ordinary use of the iPod was to listen to music and that the product was fit for that use.
E) The court upheld the decision in favor of Apple, rejecting the argument that the iPod was not merchantable because its earbuds are designed to be placed deep into the ear canal rather than over the ears, which increases the danger of hearing damage. The court pointed out that the ordinary use of the iPod was to listen to music and that the product was fit for that use.
F) The court upheld the decision in favor of Apple, rejecting the argument that the iPod was not merchantable because its earbuds are designed to be placed deep into the ear canal rather than over the ears, which increases the danger of hearing damage. The court pointed out that the ordinary use of the iPod was to listen to music and that the product was fit for that use.

In Birdsong V