Ginger owns a business that is comprehensively regulated by a federal agency.One day,a federal inspector arrives at Ginger's business without advance warning and begins to conduct a search,taking several samples of some products Ginger is manufacturing.Ginger claims this is a violation of her constitutional rights.How would a court likely rule?
A) A court is unlikely to hear the case at all because actions of federal agencies are not subject to judicial review.
B) Although agencies can conduct warrantless searches under certain circumstances,they cannot do so if a business is comprehensively regulated.
C) Because the business is comprehensively regulated,a court will assume that Ginger knows that her business is subject to periodic,unannounced inspections.
D) A court will agree that the agency violated Ginger's rights because the Fourth Amendment states that the right of the people to be secure in their persons,houses,papers,and effects,against unreasonable searches and seizures,shall not be violated.
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q16: While at the park,Tasha saw a small
Q17: The majority of work done by legislative
Q18: The Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA)has
Q19: If the President vetoes a bill and
Q20: The largest source of new law comes
Q22: Assume that in December 2006,the Environmental Protection
Q23: Congresswoman Sloan introduced a bill in the
Q24: Which is an example of an independent
Q25: The concept of stare decisis is closely
Q26: The Administrative Procedure Act
A)applies to all federal
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents