By what standard do the courts determine whether reasonable suspicion existed to justify a Terry stop?

Question

Quizplus · Accepted Answer

The courts determine whether reasonable suspicion existed to justify a Terry stop by evaluating the totality of the circumstances. This means they consider all the relevant facts and circumstances available to the officer at the time of the stop. The standard requires that the officer have specific and articulable facts to support the suspicion that the person stopped is involved in criminal activity. The judgment of the officer involved is not the sole basis for determining whether reasonable suspicion exists. Eyewitness testimony may be a factor considered in evaluating the totality of the circumstances, but it is not the standard by which reasonable suspicion is determined. The extenuating circumstances test is not a recognized standard for determining reasonable suspicion.

By What Standard Do the Courts Determine Whether Reasonable Suspicion