In which of the following circumstances would a suspicionless stop and search by a roving patrol be constitutional?

Question

Quizplus · Accepted Answer

According to the Supreme Court's decision in United States v. Martinez-Fuerte, suspicionless stop and searches by roving patrols are constitutional at the border or its functional equivalent, such as checkpoints on major highways leading away from the border. Within 30 miles of an international border may also be permissible, but the clearest and most certain answer is C. The other options listed do not necessarily provide a constitutional basis for suspicionless stop and searches.

In Which of the Following Circumstances Would a Suspicionless Stop